Welcome to IKAN
We Oppose Japan’s “IWC Reform” Proposal
You can download pdf file of following leaflet.: 
(250KB)
Joint Statement NGOs call on Japanese Government to: Comply with CITES and Stop Distributing Sei Whale Meat
Prime Minister of Japan
Shinzo Abe
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Taro Kono
Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan
Ken Saito
Minister of Environment of Japan
Masaharu Nakagawa
Most of the member countries at the committee denounced Japan, saying that bringing sei whale meat into the country is a violation of the treaty, and that this warrants a measure such as suspension of trade. None of the members supported Japan’s claims that it does not constitute a violation of the treaty.
The final decision will be taken at the Standing Committee meeting in October 2018. By the next Committee, in order to verify whether any violation of the treaty has occurred, the Secretariat will ask additional questions of Japan regarding those Japan previously failed to answer. Upon receiving the answers, the Secretariat will dispatch an investigation team to Japan.
It's not culture, but the interest of the Fisheries Agency
An interpellation regarding Japanese whaling at the Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries by Mr. Taro Yamamoto, a member of House of Councilors.
【Taro Yamamoto Official Article】
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Jun 13 2017.
Japanese NGO Joint Statement Regarding the International Whaling Commission’s meeting 66
October 18. 2016
Japanese NGO Joint Statement
Regarding the International Whaling Commission’s meeting 66
(Being held in Slovenia, October 20-28)
Statement translated from the original Japanese
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Yuji Yamamoto
Director-General of Fisheries Agency Kazuo Sato
We, Iruka & Kujira (Dolphin & Whale) Action Network, Greenpeace Japan and a collective of Japanese NGOs, request the Government of Japan to undertake the following:
1. Respect past resolutions adopted by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) and the ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and do not issue new permits intended to approve research whaling in Antarctica and the Northwest Pacific ocean, including for ‘coastal research whaling.’
2. Revoke the budget for restarting commercial whaling, since industrial whaling companies have already abandoned this as a viable business venture and there is no possibility of private firms newly entering this industry.
3. Reallocate the ¥5.1 billion budget currently allocated to research whaling and instead allocate this funding for research on coastal ecosystems and marine resources, to preserve the health of the sea.
Japanese NGOs urge political parties: Drop the proposed bill on Research Whaling, and stop wasting taxpayers’ money
JOIINT NGO STATEMENT
The “Bill On the Implementation of Cetacean Scientific Research for the Resumption of Commercial Whaling” (translation by IKAN) is a non-partisan bill that was first drafted by the opposition Democratic Party, but now aims to be passed by this Diet (Japanese Parliament) during their June session.
The objectives of the bill, as written, are to:
- Develop the Japan’s fisheries industry through implementation of commercial whaling, and
- Contribute to the sustainable use of marine organism resources.
However, the actual intent of the bill is to:
- Secure multi-year funding for research whaling
- Build a new whaling “mothership” to continue research whaling
- Roll out promotion campaigns for these specific industries using public funds, and
- Toughen immigration controls on foreign activists and shun global opinion.
There are two primary problems with the bill.
Disaster Recovery Funds Used to Cover the Research Whaling Debts Must Be Returned
Joint Statement
Disaster Recovery Funds Used to Cover the Research Whaling Debts Must Be Returned
Tokyo, November 13, 2013 – On October 5th 2012, Greenpeace Japan and the Dolphin & Whale Action Network (IKAN) called on the Board of Audit of Japan to conduct an urgent and independent investigation into the details of the misuse of 2.28 billion yen in tsunami recovery funds under the project called “Cetacean Research Stabilization Promotion,” as well as to call for returning the funds that did not meet the initial objectives of supporting Ishinomaki City in Miyagi Prefecture (1). We also urged the board to review the injection of government subsidies into whaling operations pointing out that the Institute of Cetacean Research has excessive debts (2).
On October 31st, the Board of Audit of Japan released a report on the findings from their earlier investigation, stating that the Cetacean Research Stabilization Promotion Project “cannot be accepted as a direct benefit to the recovery efforts and is a questionable expense spent from the disaster funds (3).”
